Welcome!
  • Thank you for visiting this hardworking blog. We appreciate your support!
  • Please come back often and tell your friends about All Things Democrat.
Blog Info
Beyond The Blog
  • Browse the latest liberal and progressive news feeds in Headlines.
  • See what the top blogs are saying in the Blogosphere.
  • Place an ad for free in the Classifieds For Dems.
  • Add fresh content to your lefty blog with Freebies For Bloggers.
  • Browse our database of Lefty Links, by category or keyword search (see the header).
Page Two Posts
Search Posts
Categories
Post Archives
Press
  • You have done a great job with your publication - it's one of the best blogs I have seen!

    Bob Jellison, San Diego County Democratic Party
Syndicate
Resources

Vermont Wrestles With Popular Vote Vs. Electoral College Prez Selection

Tuesday Apr 29th, 2008

God forbid the American people, rather than politically connected special people, decided an election. And before Dems started hating the concept of superdelegates, we hated the Electoral College more. That Douglas is a Bushie (yes, Vermont has (too) many rightwingers) makes his bid all the more transparent since Boy King George never won the popular vote in America, despite his two terms.

Gov. James Douglas is “not enthusiastic” about a proposal to have Vermont join a coalition of states calling for the election of the president by popular vote as opposed to the electoral college system now in place, his spokesperson said Monday.

A bill that would have Vermont join Maryland, New Jersey and Illinois in a compact to use the “one person, one vote” system instead of electoral votes to elect a person to the country’s highest political office has passed both the Vermont House and Senate.

The bill is expected to land on Douglas’ desk soon, but his spokesperson Jason Gibbs said the governor has serious philosophical and practical concerns over that proposal, opening up the possibility that he could veto the legislation.

“The governor is very concerned that this bill would put small states like Vermont at a disadvantage and decrease our influence in the election process,” Gibbs said Monday afternoon. “Fundamental changes such as altering the way we elect the process ought to be accomplished by amending the Constitution.”

2 Comments »

  1. VinceN says

    I hate to say this but I think I agree with the governor on this point.

    I don’t like the Electoral College, but I’m fairly sure that it is established by the constitution itself (Article II if I’m not mistaken) Thus any move to change that system MUST be done by a constitutional amendment.

    April 30th, 2008 | #

  2. Kate Chase says

    Vince, yes, the electoral college is one of the safeguards (one I don’t like because it’s based on distrust) devised by the founding fathers initially and expanded later to deal with the possible ramifications of “votes from the great unwashed masses.”

    Like superdelegates, I think this helps alienate the voter which to me is more critical than some of the other points the Electoral College is meant to address, such as some aspects of election fraud.

    May 1st, 2008 | #

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Register now and begin posting your comments.

Today's Gas Prices

afsc.org

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator
Featured Activists

Friends of the Earth

Purchase To Support ATD

Amazon.com

Overstock.com, Inc.overstock.com

Best PC Deals at Tiger Direct

Hotwire

Apple iTunesApple iTunes

Recent Classified Ads
For Webmasters
Freebies for Bloggers

All Things Democrat's

Lefty Links

Find lefty sites fast!

Add this to your site

Take Action
register to vote
Contact the Media
Project Vote Smart
Advertisement

Blogroll