Phony NRA Member Romney Links Assault Weapons To Single Parents

It started off as a simple question for the President “… What has your administration done or planned to do to limit the availability of assault weapons?” Among other things, the President explained:

“We’re a nation that believes in the Second Amendment, and I believe in the Second Amendment. We’ve got a long tradition of hunting and sportsmen and people who want to make sure they can protect themselves.

…my belief is that, (A), we have to enforce the laws we’ve already got, make sure that we’re keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, those who are mentally ill. We’ve done a much better job in terms of background checks, but we’ve got more to do when it comes to enforcement.

…weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don’t belong on our streets. And so what I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced. But part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence. Because frankly, in my home town of Chicago, there’s an awful lot of violence and they’re not using AK-47s. They’re using cheap hand guns.

“…part of it is also going deeper and seeing if we can get into these communities and making sure we catch violent impulses before they occur.”

Crowley: “Governor Romney, the question is about assault weapons, AK-47s.” Romney (my emphasis):

Which two people look like political panderers in this picture?

Yeah, I’m not in favor of new pieces of legislation on — on guns and taking guns away or making certain guns illegal. We, of course, don’t want to have automatic weapons, and that’s already illegal in this country to have automatic weapons. What I believe is we have to do, as the president mentioned towards the end of his remarks there, which is to make enormous efforts to enforce the gun laws that we have, and to change the culture of violence that we have.

And you ask how — how are we going to do that? And there are a number of things. He mentioned good schools. I totally agree. We were able to drive our schools to be number one in the nation in my state. And I believe if we do a better job in education, we’ll — we’ll give people the — the hope and opportunity they deserve and perhaps less violence from that.

But let me mention another thing. And that is parents. We need moms and dads, helping to raise kids. Wherever possible the — the benefit of having two parents in the home, and that’s not always possible. A lot of great single moms, single dads. But gosh to tell our kids that before they have babies, they ought to think about getting married to someone, that’s a great idea.

Because if there’s a two parent family, the prospect of living in poverty goes down dramatically. The opportunities that the child will — will be able to achieve increase dramatically. So we can make changes in the way our culture works to help bring people away from violence and give them opportunity, and bring them in the American system.

Romney thinks we still have an assault weapons ban; however, the 1994 legislation banning those weapons expired in 2004, and attempts to reinstate the ban have so far been unsuccessful. You’d think a very recent “lifetime member” of the NRA would know that. Anyway, are they hard to get? Not at all. One online arms dealer offers assistance in ordering them:

It is a common misconception that machine guns cannot be owned by law-abiding citizens. This comes from the creation of a variety of confusing laws that have made purchasing a full-auto gun more difficult than purchasing a “normal” gun. But, if you can comply with the law, you may qualify to own a machine gun.

Although it may seem complicated, we are happy to help you through every step in the process. We have transferable guns in stock, and if we don’t have it, we can tap into a network of dealers in other states to find it for you. Let us help you get the full-auto gun that you’ve always wanted– they are worth it!

There really seems to be no shortage of these weapons:

YouTube Preview Image

The bigger question here is – why did Mitt Romney connect a voter’s question about assault weapons to single parents? The answer is simple: Republicans claim all societal problems can be linked back to single parents, more precisely, single mothers. But kids aren’t using these weapons on the street; as the President pointed out, most crimes are committed with hand guns. So where’s the real market for automatic weapons? The redneck Republican base. For example:

There are politicians:

YouTube Preview Image

Political Parties:

On Sept. 29, the Asheville Tea Party is hosting a “Machine Gun Social” at an indoor arms range in Brevard, North Carolina.

This isn’t the first time that Tea Party-affiliated groups or campaigns have held this type of fundraiser. In February 2010, Republican House candidate Tim D’Annunzio had a fundraiser that offered a barbecue dinner and a semi-automatic machine gun magazine at a Fayetteville, N.C. shooting range. And in September 2009, a candidate aiming to become South Carolina’s adjutant general, or leader of the state’s National Guard, launched his campaign at a shooting range with a raffle to win an AK-47. (from Up the Joneses)

Guys who are overcompensating for something?:

YouTube Preview Image

Idiot parents who think a 3 year old should learn how to shoot one:

YouTube Preview Image

Moms and Dads bonding with their 8 year old daughters:

YouTube is full of videos like 6 year old kid shooting a gun, and Child Shooting the 3-Gun AR15 at 100 Yard Steel Targets, this even after an 8 year old died when his assault weapon backfired at one of these little get-togethers.

Oh, and FYI Mitt: In an article titled “Child gun deaths as common in rural as urban areas”, Reuters reports that:

“The rate of accidental gun death was 0.5 per 100,000 in the most-rural counties, compared with 0.1 per 100,000 in the most urban.”

So take your single parent theories and stick them straight up your ass – right alongside your head.

* In the interest of fairness, a National Institute of Justice report found that assault weapons were used in just 2 percent of gun crimes reported nationwide before the 1994 ban. Unfortunately, when they are used in crimes, the casualties are greater.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Barack Obama, Debates, Election, Gun Control, Mitt Romney, Politics, Republicans and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://allthingsdemocrat.com/ Doug Marquardt

    Great article! That last statement is the most important point in the discussion on gun laws, in my opinion.

    I break with many of my fellow Dems in that I own handguns. My reasons for owning them have been alarming to some. I live in Arizona where many Dems own guns, and they should. We’re infested with Tea Party traitors (anyone who wants to overthrow the government is, by definition, a traitor), anti-government militia groups (who it seems are only “anti-government” when Dems are in control of the government), and many who are just plain nuts (ask Gabby Giffords). In fact, this appears to be the case throughout the southern states and I would strongly recommend Democrats arm themselves for their own self-protection.

    However, I firmly believe that no citizen should be allowed to own a weapon that is equal to or more powerful than the weapons of law enforcement. How can they protect us from the criminals and crazies if the criminals and crazies are better armed? It used to be that things like machine guns were something guys thought were cool, like in action flicks, and if you wanted to fire one, you’d join the military. Now the radical right thinks they have a right under the second amendment to own them. If they want to take the constitution so literally, give them muskets from that era and nothing more.

    • clrose

      Thanks. I own guns as well, living out in Tennessee’s no-man’s land, and I love to shoot, but I also agree with all of your points. It’s one thing to own a gun(s) (and Repubs would be surprised at how many liberals do), it’s another thing when it becomes your identity to the point where you have your small children out there with automatic weapons.

      The reason I read most for these yahoos giving their LITTLE kids access to shooting is that it teaches them gun safety; but they’re kids, and it might also give them a false sense of security around any gun that any fool leaves out.

      Now we have Republican legislators enacting laws that make it okay to shoot the police in “self-defense” if they mistakenly enter your home! If government doesn’t respect the police, why should anyone else?

      The musket idea is right on the mark, and precisely why I believe the Constitution is a living document.

      • Ken White

        wow it always gets me when I see little kids using those big guns. I used to be against guns but changed my mind earlier this year. it was after i left for work when a magazine salesman pushed his way into our home. My wife had to grab our infant son and lock herself in the bed room. She yelled that she was calling the cops and he ran off. As i got the call at work I rushed home and after we gave our statement to the police we sat down and decided to buy a gun. We bought a shotgun but now we are looking at getting a handgun. I recently was looking at the market for a handgun and am thinking about the Springfield xd 16 rounder. I’m worried if I should buy it though is that considered too much gun? I know in some states I should stick with 10 rounds…

  • CollegeDad

    Hello everyone! Its nice to see Democrats who have some guns! Good for you! For the sake of full disclosure I would like to inform you that I am a registered republican and plan on voting for Romney because of this issue. Before you think I’m ignorant read the next paragraph because I’m far from the traditional republican on social issues. My hope is that after reading this I can at least get ONE democrat to either understand where I’m coming from or change their view on firearms entirely. At the very most have a fundamental change in the democratic parties stance on firearms as a whole (lol one can only hope).

    First of all up until the last few years I strongly believed in practically all of the republican values. As soon as I moved out of my parents house and became the sole provider for my wife and child MANY of my views on social issues have changed. These issues include the integration of lgbt individuals into the institution of marriage and every other facet where they are disadvantaged. The continued right for women to choose. The integration of a government sponsored heath care system. End all current wars and bring our troops home. Strict separation of church and state. The Democrat platform is known for these views and is a very future forward thinking kind of party. But then I read articles like this which so vehemently oppose guns and I just feel sick to my stomach…

    This is who I am and what I believe: I’m a 23 year old married father and I believe that firearms are an essential part of american society. This opinion is one which hasn’t changed since I started following politics.

     As a full time college student I did a 10 page research paper on firearms technology and how it has impacted society. I understand the violence which these weapons have caused during the 20th century. I also understand that the firearm is the king of personal hand held weaponry. America is not in the wild west and I’m not saying we should go back to those ways. But we are responsible for our own protection until the police arrive.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbiahttp://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.htmlhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1976377/postshttp://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html#1If there was ever any danger to myself or family it would be minutes before police arrive. And that is assuming the police can even be called in time. I am a 6’3′ 250lb man but have never once been in a real fight. Today’s society has conditioned me against it. It’s not surprising that the thought of holding off or fighting a hardened criminal for 4 – 7 minutes seems insane. Without a firearm I would be at a huge disadvantage at worst and possible equal at best. Risk should be absolutely minimal when your entire families life is at stake. Firearms minimize this risk and give the power back to the people not to criminals. Normal law abiding citizens deserve the ability to choose a firearm to protect themselves.I noticed one of the previous posters was concerned about citizens having equal or more powerful weapons than law enforcement. 
    I believe law enforcement will always have the upper hand when it comes to apprehending criminals. Law Enforcement agencies have federally funded access to state of the art body armor, military grade ammunition, constantly evolving tactical weaponry, and don’t forget tactical vehicles. With this knowledge I believe that until we live in a world without crime or war law abiding individuals should have the ability to own as many CURRENTLY legal firearms and as much ammunition as they deem necessary. Also our current laws are already limiting the access to these weapons from underage, felons, known mentally unstable, even stalkers. My point is I think reasonable measures have already been taken to regulate firearms for the american public.If you are still reading you might want to know more:With all the dangers and bad press that guns get do you know that there are an estimated 250 million firearms privately owned in the united states? 
    So that means in a nation of over 300 million people there are 250 million guns. In 2010 firearms related murder totaled up to 12996 murders. 
    http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl08.xls

    By this logic firearms related murder only affected 0.00004332% of Americans in 2010. Wheres the threat? Why systematically dismantle our second amendment rights to buy and own firearms? Most of serious violent crime is not caused by the ownership of firearms by normal Americans. It is caused by the Abnormal few.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=H_RrLyV9rDUC&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9&dq=250+million+guns&source=bl&ots=OqNXNJraoQ&sig=PNrAcVNOLyxxkSjWMZvXLciz3LI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=v46AUL_iFaXw2gXpooGIDg&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=250%20million%20guns&f=false

    People who use guns violently are NOT normal and should not be used as a basis to ban firearms.I might actually be changing your mind at this point… or not lol but here is more info:Some brief education about the ASSAULT WEAPONS. One of these weapons is the ar-15. Over 3 million law abiding normal american’s own this model. This weapon is not the one our soldiers are using overseas it is a civilian model which is limited to semi-auto. These ASSAULT WEAPONS are some of the most efficient, reliable, and widespread models of firearms in the country. It is like banning the production of a corvette cause its just too fast. Diane Fienstien wants to ban handguns nationwide. Handguns are very versatile for personal protection. They have less penetration than rifles and allow for safer discharge of the firearm in regards to urban areas. Plus they are plenty powerful to stop an intruder not to mention lightweight and easy to maneuver in the confines of a house. These models are important to gun owners nationwide and should not be discriminated against. You might be thinking I’m a gun nut right wing fascist but I only own one firearm. This firearm stays locked in a gun cabinet 99% of the time. My free time is spent with my family or studying. I’m a normal American just like you.Thanks for reading this. I have a lot of democrat friends and instead of bringing up politics (and possibly ruining my friendship with them) I figured I would speak my mind on this forum. Let me know how you feel and if I changed your mind. I enjoy listening to gun loving democrats!!!JUST A REMINDER:May I remind you that you have the right to become a proud firearms owner? All you need to do is drive to your preferred gun shop. Once arrived select your weapon of choice. If you see one that you like then proceed to fill out the necessary paperwork, show identification, and have a background check performed. If everything runs through its a simple matter of payment and you are a proud firearms owner!   

    That’s my view