The NRA is Pitting Races Against Each Other To Sell Guns

diverse babies
Over the last several weeks, the NRA and its surrogates have, at various points, told people of each of the major ethnic

groups in America—white, Black, Hispanic and Asian—that they need guns to protect them from the others.

On January 1st, Lindsey Graham, Republican Senator from South Carolina, addressed a Congressional hearing on gun violence. As background, the NRA paid Lindsey Graham $20,000 in political donations between 2002 and 2012. The NRA also gave Senator Graham an ‘A’

grade. And to think, in high school, you had to slip that $100 bill in with the calculus test to get that A. Lindsey Graham got an A and they slipped HIM $20,000! One sterling example of his A-level work is that Graham voted ‘yes’

on decreasing the waiting period for gun show background checks from 3 days to 1. That way, if you catch your wife cheating on you, you don’t have to go through the whole hassle of waiting until you’ve thought it through and cooled

down.

graham gunsAddressing Mark Kelly—husband of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, who was shot in the head and nearly died—Graham said,

“In 1992, you had the riots in Los Angeles. I think it was the ‘King Event.’ But you could find yourself in this country in a lawless environment due to a natural disaster or a riot. And the story was about a place called

Koreatown. There are marauding gangs going throughout the area, burning stores, looting and robbing and raping.”

He used this example of angry Black mobs to argue that people need assault rifles and large capacity magazines to defend themselves. In the story, he particularly suggests that Asians should be prepared to defend themselves against

Black people. There’s plenty of research that seeks to explain the socioeconomic details of why LA was such a powder keg prior to the riots. Graham blithely ignores it and

glosses over a hugely complex event as though it could be boiled down to Black gangs marauding. Interestingly, the research does not suggest that adding more high-powered weapons in civilian hands would have helped the situation. The

LA riots are not a good example for a gun policy debate, because it sticks out as such an unusual event. But, most importantly, should a prominent member of the government really be arguing for policy positions based on the assumption

of the breakdown of society? And if society is so fragile, shouldn’t lawmakers like Graham be seeking ways to address the root problems, not encouraging people to be able to blast holes in each other in tense situations?

On February 13th, NRA Vice President and professional Yosemite Sam impersonator, Wayne LaPierre published an op-ed in the Daily Caller entitled Stand And Fight.

While the title refers to a fight against gun control, the op-ed itself partly implies that we need to stand and fight against gangs of marauding minorities brought on by the Obama presidency. LaPierre writes,

“Latin American drug gangs have invaded every city of significant size in the United States. Phoenix is already one of the kidnapping capitals of the world, and though the states on the U.S./Mexico border may be the first

places in the nation to suffer from cartel violence, by no means are they the last.

The president flagrantly defies the 2006 federal law ordering the construction of a secure border fence along the entire Mexican border. So the border today remains porous not only to people seeking jobs in the U.S., but to criminals

whose jobs are murder, rape, robbery and kidnapping.”

wayne gunsSo, the Black president is letting Mexican gangsters come to America to steal your job, rob, rape, kidnap and murder you.

Capisce? Nonpartisan Politifact.com rates LaPierre’s claim that Phoenix is one of the kidnapping capitals in the world as “false,” saying,

“we find no justification to support such a sweeping claim.”

LaPierre gives no clue as to how he would propose to build a 700-mile long fence and maintain it. He conveniently ignores the fact that the Great Wall of China did not keep out the Mongolian hordes.

But LaPierre doesn’t stop at Latinos. He also has a thing or two to say about Brooklyn.

“After Hurricane Sandy, we saw the hellish world that the gun prohibitionists see as their utopia. Looters ran wild in south Brooklyn. There was no food, water or electricity. And if you wanted to walk several miles to get

supplies, you better get back before dark, or you might not get home at all.

Anti-gun New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg had already done everything he could to prevent law-abiding New Yorkers from owning guns, and he has made sure that no ordinary citizen will ever be allowed to carry a gun. He even refused

to allow the National Guard into the city to restore civil order because Guardsmen carry guns!”

Or maybe because the NYPD had it under control with “a cop on every block”? It almost sounds like LaPierre is getting

Sandy confused with Katrina. There was looting in Brooklyn after Sandy, and it shouldn’t be tolerated, but is it worth shooting someone who doesn’t know when they’ll have electricity, food, water or heat again to prevent them from

taking some cereal boxes? LaPierre certainly believes it is. Or at least it is in Brooklyn, where a lot of folks are, you know, urban.

On March 1st, the NRA News, a propaganda operation for the NRA, unveiled its newest contributor, Colion Noir, a self-described “urban

gun enthusiast.” Noir’s 84-second youtube rant urges Black folks to arm themselves against white people and the US government.

“No one wants to fight for their protection. They want the government to do it. The same government who at one point hosed us down with water, attacked us with dogs, and wouldn’t allow us to eat at their restaurants, and

told us we couldn’t own guns when bumbling fools with sheets on their heads were riding around burning crosses on our lawns, and murdering us.”

noir guns

While many of these points are valid, the Civil Rights Act did end Jim Crow and Segregation. If the KKK were ever to come back in force and the government were to tacitly support it, I would be the first to encourage Black people to

defend themselves. Race relations are by no means perfect in this country and history is important, but the reality that predominated before the 1960s is not the

reality of today. Last year, in the heart of the South, a KKK rally was outnumbered 5 to 1 by people who showed up in clown costumes to

mock them. Public ridicule is ultimately a more potent weapon than a gun. The First Amendment is fed by a clip of unlimited ammo. The Second Amendment is fed by a clip that jams up with you in jail or in the grave.

clowns gunsBut the real problem develops when Noir talks about how easy it is to get illegal magazines,

“how hard do you think it will be for Hookie Billy, Wan and Jesus to get their hands on one if they wanted to?”

It seems that Noir is telling his viewers that if a white redneck, an Asian gangster and a Hispanic gangster can get illegal ammo clips, then shouldn’t Black folks be able to? I can’t possibly imagine that this resonates with very many

Black people. It’s demeaning to everyone involved to drive the discussion down to the denominator of what gangs are up to. He seems to kind of presume that Black people generally are intimately familiar with gang activities, which is

patronizing at best. I would never assume that white people are intimately familiar with the activities of white supremacist groups. Is arming yourself to the teeth really the best way to deal with gang activity in your area? Would

that not make you more of a target? It seems especially offensive to the Black community at large to suggest that what they need is more guns, when the homicide rate is 15

times higher in the Black community than in the white community. Clearly more guns is not the answer.

Noir particularly focuses on assault rifles, saying, “I want an AK.” This is a bizarre blend of hip hop style delivery and content with the NRA’s paranoid mantra of: arm yourself now before it’s too late! It sounds tinny and

patronizing.

Noir concludes by saying,

“Guy telling me to get rid of my guns when I need them the most isn’t my friend, isn’t looking out for my best interests, and doesn’t speak for me or the community that I’m part of.”

In the NRA’s world, there are thick, bright lines between racial communities that cannot be crossed. And no one speaks for, to or within these communities. They just arm themselves against each other and hunker down for the worst.

This trio of rhetorical broadsides by the NRA tells white and Asian people to arm themselves against Blacks, whites to arm themselves against Hispanics and Blacks, and Blacks to arm themselves against whites, Asians and Hispanics. The

overall effect reveals one of two things. Either the NRA is run by people who seriously need a mental health intervention pronto. Or the NRA is so thoroughly wedded to selling guns at all costs that it has gagged any semblance of

decency it may once have had, tied it to a column in a dank basement and uses it as target practice.

Together, these quotes are similar to a prediction revealed to the public in 1970 that, after a few murders, Blacks would rise up, starting a race war. Whites would start fighting amongst themselves, leaving the country to the Blacks.

Blacks wouldn’t be able to handle the responsibility and would hand responsibility over to the Asians. That was the prediction made by Charles Manson. And in Wayne LaPierre’s head, it still rings just as true today as it did then.

manson gunsFollow Marc on Facebook.

Print Friendly
Share
This entry was posted in Gun Control, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
This site for Democrats welcomes comments from all viewpoints as long as they are on topic and contribute to the discussion. Trolls are absolutely not tolerated.
Anonymized Disqus accounts are treated as spam. For more details, see our Commenting Policy.
  • http://allthingsdemocrat.com/ Doug Marquardt

    [posted originally by Sharon Place Bishop]

    According to opensecrets.org, the NRA has contributed over $1.0m to political contacts. They employ former congressional employees to lobby on their behalf, to which they spend over $2.9 million in 2012 alone. The NRA only cares about their bottom line. The more they can spread their propaganda and fear, the more money they make. . To pass restrictive gun legislation means they make less money. Their lack of empathy for human life is appalling. They appeal to the Tea Party because they are both terrorists from within–birds of a feather….. When you actually hear the rhetoric being spewed from this group, they are less than one degree away from the Taliban. As Dems, we cannot allow this dogma to infiltrate our society anymore. We must put all our energy into stopping the maddness, the terrorists who have infiltrated our gov’t, our business, our vaginas, etc (I think you get the point). Vote 2014, and defy this group every chance you get!

  • http://allthingsdemocrat.com/ Doug Marquardt

    [posted originally by Nancye Kirtley]

    That is truly offensive when a United States Senator says something like that about a demographic of people who reside in the country. All “People of Color” should remember this at election time and vote these Idiots out of office. They are harmful, insulting and dangerous to our country. They need to go, now..Oh and by the way, this Idiot Graham costs us tax payers a whopping $174,000. a year folks….do you really want to pay that much out to be insulted, “Black people”? After all aren’t you tax payers, too?