Elementary School More Morally Advanced Than Responsible Citizens Group

According to the great British comedian Eddie Izzard, California has always been the “wild and crazy state.”  But in a good way.  And now a San Francisco Bay area elementary school is charting new waters by offering the first ever toy gun “buyback” program.

Charles Hill, the principle of Strobridge Elementary School in Hayward, feels kids that play with guns may not take real guns seriously.  He went on to say, “Playing with toy guns, saying ‘I’m going to shoot you,’ desensitizes them so as they get older, it’s easier for them to use a real gun.”

The idea for the buyback came from a photographer, Horace Gibson, who takes the school’s student photos.  Hill also called upon the nationwide cases where police have mistaken a toy gun for a real one, as manufacturers aim for realism.

The school planned a whole day of activities around the buyback called Strobridge Elementary Safety Day.  Hayward police were on hand to demonstrate bicycle and gun safety while the Alameda County Fire Department sent a truck and crew to talk about fire safety.  The event also offered fingerprinting and photographing of children, where they loaded the information on to a CD for the parents in case their child goes missing.

Every child who attended was given a ticket to exchange for a book.  And if they turned in a toy gun, they also received a raffle ticket that could win them one of four bicycles.

When I first heard about this event, I thought it was a little silly.  But after giving it some thought and getting as much information as I could about the event, I stand up and applaud Hill and Strobridge Elementary.  I hope other schools can take the hint and hold their own Safety Day events.

However, not everyone stood behind the buyback.  Yih-Chau Chang, a spokesman for the gun-rights group Responsible Citizens of California said that “playing cops and robbers or cowboys and Indians” was “a normal part of growing up.”

“While the intentions are obviously good on the part of the school administration, this doesn’t really educate children about guns or gun safety,” he said. “Guns are used in crimes, but they are more often used in defensive ways which prevent violent crime from occurring in the first place.”

Chang also questioned whether toys can look like real weapons saying, “Toy manufacturers are forced to paint guns in bright colors, usually orange or yellow, that make it virtually impossible for an officer to mistake it for a real gun.”

But what about the upsurge of colored real guns?  Friday night – the night before the buyback event – a 3-year-old boy in South Carolina was killed after he picked up a pink gun he thought was a toy and it discharged.  And have you seen the Hello Kitty AK-47?  (Picture provided)  It looks like a toy and the Hello Kitty just screams for little girls to pick it up.  Globalgrind has even compiled a list of 12 guns that look like toys, including one that has bullets painted to match.

tumblr_m9aa4miQbK1rrfrdzo1_500

Everyone who has read my very first post on All Things Dem about gun control and the Second Amendment knows how I feel on this issue.  But I am still astounded by the stupidity of people – especially the ones with frou-frous colored guns who leave said guns loaded and lying around.  Not only are you too stupid to own a gun but you are way too stupid to be breeding.  And as another great British comedian Jimmy Carr says, “Let’s face it, the gene pool needs a little chlorine.  You know who you are!”

Print Friendly
Posted in Gun Control | Tagged
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

I Hate it When I Agree with a Republican

GOP Rep. Peter King of NY was asked by CNN’s Anderson Cooper whether journalists should be punished for reporting on classified information that’s been leaked. King’s reply was yes.

Let’s think about this for a minute. There’s “good” whistle-blowing, the kind that alerts the public to illegal activities, such as reporting a company that knowingly dumps pollutants into a river and refuses to stop, and many people were made sick by the chemicals in their drinking water. I think we can all agree that this is something that should be exposed. If an individual copies a company’s documents and leaks them, I don’t feel that a reporter should be punished for publishing them. Maybe its because of the positive outcome or the fact that it does not make us less secure. But, if the employee had a confidentiality agreement with the company, then they could still be held responsible. There is risk involved with whistle-blowing and you’d better be sure that what you’re about to do is protected by law.

Now, let’s think about U.S. citizens working in the intelligence community who are copying secret government documents and selling them to another country, say North Korea. Do we all agree that this is leaking classified documents and not whistle-blowing, and these individuals should be punished? North Korea is an enemy, but I assume that releasing them to an ally is still a crime.

If the answer is yes, then what about the same U.S. citizen copying secret government documents and, instead of selling them to North Korea, he gives them to a website to publish. Shouldn’t that be the same, punishable crime as the individual who sold those documents to North Korea? Does the difference, selling secret documents versus giving-away the documents, matter?

And now to the question of whether a reporter can be punished for reporting the contents of secret documents that have been leaked. I’d truly like to know how people are making this judgement. Of course a reporter can report on the story. But if a reporter prints the contents of leaked secret documents, is it the degree to which the information is harmful that determines if its punishable? So if the reporter prints the names of covert operatives currently working in Pakistan that came from leaked secret government documents, that would likely cause their deaths. So it should be a crime for the reporter to publish them. But if the secret documents include thousands of files that the reporter believes are not harmful to anyone, then its not a crime to publish them? And who should ultimately determine if they are harmful? Or is it that once its been published online, by a site like Wikileaks, its fair game for anyone to use? Cats out of the bag – no harm, no foul? I’m finding it very hard to conclude that both the “leaker” and the reporter should not be punished.

In the end, in the case of Manning, if something’s going to be released because it was a crime and he reported it to his commanding officers and they refused to address it, and I’ve yet to read that this was the case, I have a very hard time understanding why Manning didn’t just release the video of the military mistakenly killing reporters. Why did he feel the need to release 700,000+ files? He certainly didn’t know what was on the files; it was just a blind data dump. If he spent just 60 seconds reviewing each file and worked on nothing else, 8 hours a day through a 5 day workweek, it would have taken him 5.61 years to review them (there 124,800 minutes in a year for an 8 hour, 5 day workweek). But, of course, he had a job to do so he would have to sneak a peak at the files between his duties. At that pace, reviewing the files may have taken him decades. For all he knew, the files contained the names of Army Special Forces, the location of troops, future missions, or foreign informants. It was highly irresponsible.

And the detail on Snowden sounds stranger by the day. I don’t know what to make of that. First he’s a janitor, then he’s suddenly an IT consultant with the CIA with no college degree or experience? I’ve been a computer programmer since 1997. The companies I’ve worked for would never hire an IT consultant with no degree or experience. Seems fishy to me.

Print Friendly
Posted in Intelligence Community, Military Matters, Politics, Republicans | Tagged , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Republicans Outraged Over Surveillance of Americans by Obama, But Not by Bush

Republicans were infuriated by the “breaking news” that Obama and the NSA have been listening to our phone conversations. They conveniently forget that it was George W. Bush who directed the NSA to start this eavesdropping program. In fact, PBS/Frontline ran a program that explained the surveillance program in great detail with interviews of the Bush Administration officials involved. Frontline ran the original report on the 10th anniversary of 9/11 and there was nothing said by Republicans. The report was re-run on April 11, 2013 with additional footage on the Boston Marathon Bombing. This was less than two months ago, and again, not a peep was heard from Republicans. But now the NSA surveillance under the Obama Administration dovetails nicely with the IRS “scandal”, so the radical right is up-in-arms and in full scandal mode.

Just after 9/11 and under Bush’s directive, the NSA’s top secret electronic surveillance system began surveillance of American citizens without a warrant under the guise of a “Terrorist Surveillance Program”. Their “global electronic dragnet” covered computer networks, radio, and telephone calls made all over the world, including by Americans. It took years for reporters to uncover this top secret operation, as the NSA budget is a state secret. Frontline reported that the NSA collected 1.7 billion communication intercepts every day. The NSA did not have the manpower to sift through that daily mountain of data so they hired 480 private contracting companies. These companies were military contractors with no experience in intelligence work who now rushed to grab a share of the billions of dollars in government contracts. Employees of these private companies with no experience in intelligence were now listening into the conversations of Americans. This was discovered in Bush’s second term, but where was the Republican outrage?

In part 3 of the 5 part Frontline program, then NSA chief Michael Hayden explains the secret surveillance program – the “battle for the American homeland”.

Watch Top Secret America on PBS. See more from FRONTLINE.

I find it beyond ridiculous that the radical right is now laying all of this on the doorstep of this White House. Some are even back-peddling on their support for the Patriot Act. But then again, they’re just following orders from their leaders at the Heritage Foundation.

Print Friendly
Posted in Barack Obama, George W Bush, Intelligence Community, Politics, September 11, Terrorism | Tagged , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden Seeks Asylum Where?

A lot of (but not all) liberals, myself included, are peeved at President Obama for maintaining a policy which candidate Obama denounced in the 2008 election.  To be sure, after denouncing the program Senator Obama voted to expand the Patriot Act in the heat of the campaign, which was a vote that led to some trouble with his base.   I feel one of the greatest strengths of the liberal side of the great political divide is that we can agree to disagree with others on this side of the aisle.  It is also one of our greatest weaknesses.  The Democratic party is a herd of cats, unlike the monolithic wall of support President Bush enjoyed from the Republican party as he forwarded manifestly bone headed policy which was rubberstamped by a Republican controlled congress time and time again.

The continuation of the domestic spy program along with the determination to “look forward, not backward“ on the issue of the Bush torture regimen are policy decisions which have troubling implications for this nation going forward IMHO.

The decision to allow an officially sanctioned torture program without punishing those responsible is, by far, the most disturbing action, or lack there of, taken by the president during his time in office.   Future administrations that are inclined to do so can simply enact another torture program without fear of being held accountable based upon this horrible precedent.

If President Obama, who campaigned against the spy program, expands it what are the chances that a future president will ever end it?   I was perturbed by domestic spying under President Bush and the fact that President Obama has covered the program in a patina of uber secret legality does not really change my opinion on the matter.  Something is wrong with secret programs that are rubberstamped by secret judges and only disclosed to congressional members who are sworn to secrecy even if they disagree with the program.

Having noted these issues, let me affirm my continued support of the president in general.    He is far preferable to the options provided on the ballot in both elections I voted for him.  Everytime Mitt Romney expresses some smug opinion such as how the timing of Sandy was inconvenient I thank my lucky stars that he is not the president.  John McCain would have us involved with military adventures in Iran and Syria, in addition to keeping troops in Iraq with no prospect of withdrawal from there, or Afghanistan.  President Obama may not be perfect but I would vote for him again tomorrow, without a 2nd thought, given the same choices or if he were opposed by any other Republican with a chance at that parties nomination.

Having established that his handling of these issues in the “war on terror” is wanting from my perspective, let me note one aspect that must be accounted for.  This president, more than any other in our nations history, must feel the weight of protecting the nation on a personal level.  His political enemies have falsely attacked him for sympathizing with terrorists,  being a secret Muslim, being a foreigner, while incessantly mocking his middle name, and are just oultandishly hostile for any reason they can make up.

President Bush suffered 9/11 on his watch and Democrats supported him following that attack.   Can you imagine the uproar, the absolute vitriol against President Obama if a domestic terrorist attack one tenth the magnitude of 9/11 happened while he was in office?  What are the chances that his political opposition would support the president under that circumstance?  The answer to that rhetorical question is self evidently “nil”.

On to the case of Edward Snowden, the high school dropout who is responsible for the recent revelations of domestic spying.   If the government is going to let high school dropouts who have not completed computer courses in community college provide technical support for the most sensitive hardware in our national intelligence network, it is just a wonder there are any secrets left at all.

What Snowden did when he knew he was going to leak these programs irks me.   Claiming he does not want to live in a society that would allow this sort of invasion of privacy, Snowden fled to Hong Kong.

It seems to me that if he really is concerned about an overbearing central government peeking into the daily affairs of its own citizenry, Snowden has jumped from the frying pan into the fire.  He seeks asylum in China,  who block Google searches and run peaceful protestors over with tanks.  What will Snowden think if he wants to search for the date of the Tiananmen Square crackdown on Google, and finds the results blocked.  I suppose once he experiences the iron handed grip of the Chinese authorities in that countries daily life Edwards will be honor bound to seek asylum… in North Korea!

I would feel the same way if a Boston Redsox player wrote a scathing editorial against big moneyed payrolls being used to buy championships, releasing confidential spread sheets that detailed the personal finances of his team mates to buttress his argument, and then signed on with the New York Yankees.

Print Friendly
Posted in Barack Obama, Central Intelligence Agency, Congress, Conservatives, Government, Intelligence Community, Politics, Security, September 11, Terrorism, The Constitution, The Media, Torture | Tagged , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Terry McAuliffe Must Defeat An Extremist, But Its No Walk in the Park

Virginia is preparing for a grueling 2013 gubernatorial campaign between Terry McAuliffe and Ken Cuccinelli, which will be taking place on November 5th of this year. Some voters have called this election a so-called “lesser of two evils” race, citing Cuccinelli’s extreme views and the “sleaziness” of McAuliffe. But why is this race so important to Virginians and receiving so much media attention?

One reason is that most people recognize that we can’t allow an extremist like Cuccinelli, the Paul Ryan of Virginia, to be in any position of power. I am from Virginia myself, and I can tell you that there is growing sentiment that Cuccinelli’s views on social issues are too extreme. Some of these views include opposing gay rights, opposing abortion and women’s reproductive rights (which is fairly standard in today’s GOP), including claims that Planned Parenthood is racist. But Cuccinelli has failed to realize how Democratic-leaning Virginia is becoming each year, which swung the state for Obama two elections in a row. Most Virginians recognize who is the “lesser of two evils”, but unfortunately they don’t realize why McAuliffe is actually the good guy.

terryTerry McAuliffe began his road to success when he helped found a bank at the age of 18. As the DNC Chairman for 4 years, he helped raise $578 Million for the Party and brought them out of debt for the first time, ever. Despite Republicans trying to depict him as a terrible person, he’s actually a terrific father and husband. Oh, and he’s friends with Bill Clinton. I think that Democrats and his campaign need to focus more on why Virginia needs him, and less on why we don’t need Cuccinelli. His campaign should also begin to counter the Republicans’ irrelevant and false, personal attacks.

More than 75% of Virginians have made up their mind on Cuccinelli, but 40% don’t know about McAuliffe. I think this is attributed to the media focusing on Cuccinelli and E.W. Jackson’s insane comments, and that may actually be part of the GOP strategy. Jackson is one of the most extreme Tea Partiers in politics and certainty the most “Conservative” in Virginia. But as the saying goes, even bad press is good press. So this year, more than ever, we need Virginians to stop the “extreme dream team” from seizing power.

Print Friendly
Posted in Campaigns, Conservatives, Democrats, Election, Governors, Tea Party | Tagged , , , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Are Document Leaks Setting the Stage for the Next NeoCon Administration?

“When people feel uncertain, they’d rather have somebody that’s strong and wrong than somebody who’s weak and right.” President Bill Clinton

Watching the corporate media, the GOP propaganda machine, and (sadly) some lefty enablers tearing into the Obama Administration leaves me with an overwhelming sense of deja vu. This is very much a repeat of the last Democratic President’s second term; the vultures are picking-away at tiny scraps of minutia and claiming they are watergate-sized scandals, releasing phoney accusations on a weekly basis, and laying blame with Obama for all actions by all federal agencies, all in an effort to prevent this president from receiving credit for saving our economy and repairing our image in the world. As was the case with President Clinton, the radical right believes the Obama presidency is not legitimate and he should not receive credit for any good that was done during his two terms. And as we are also painfully aware, there are many on the right who believe this black man should not live in the White House.

What’s new this time is the government workers and active duty military, self-described “whistle-blowers”, who find something that may or may not be a crime and, instead of reporting it to their supervisor or going through the proper channels, they leak documents to the public. Why they are not reporting it to their supervisors or going through the proper channels to report these incidents is not at all clear. In my opinion, its a misguided desire to play hero to supporters of wikileaks, anonymous and other whistle-blowing groups, which is why they not only release the documents related to the incident they are upset about, but they release thousands of additional, unrelated documents. These documents detail policies practiced by all administrations but only serve to embarrass and weaken the current administration.

Its not the issues raised that will hurt Democrats as much as the constant leak, leak, leak of U.S. documents. I’m convinced that this may result in a general belief among voters that Democrats are incompetent, or that they cannot manage government employees or the military, or, worst of all, that they are unable to ensure the secrecy of vital U.S. documents and the safety of U.S. contacts abroad. This could ultimately set the stage for the next neocon administration. Because as Clinton suggested, people would rather have a strong person leading, even if they don’t agree with them on many issues. And can you imagine a coalition of neocons and tea party groups in the White House? These new neocons may actually be led by another Bush – Jeb. They’ll likely return to the same type of secretive, locked-down government they had in the second Bush/Cheney Administration. But in this case, whistleblowers will be shuttled-off to secret prisons, never to be seen again.

I’m not suggesting that all whistle-blowing is wrong. I think corporate whistle-blowing has been necessary in cases where laws were broken and the whistle-blower could not get the company to change its business practices. But I’ve been unable to find any reports on the internet where the individuals who leaked government and military documents (in the cases of Snowden and Manning) first reported the activities to their superiors and/or took it further up the chain of command if they weren’t satisfied. It seems they simply decided to leak the documents, regardless of the consequences to our nation and our allies. Frankly, I question their motives; are they releasing documents to get attention from the wikileaks/anonymous/occupy groups, who seem to believe that the release of any document is always Ok? Or are they releasing them because they dislike the current administration?

Print Friendly
Posted in Barack Obama, Intelligence Community, Military Matters, Politics, Republican Propaganda Machine | Tagged , , , , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Gun Nuts: School Shooting In 2002 Example Of Good Gun Use

Dick Heller is a hero to 2nd amendment absolutists because the Supreme Court used a case that he was a part of to expand gun rights.  Dick is the Heller in District of Columbia V Heller.

He believes the media routinely misreport on guns because the reporters just do not understand guns. If they would just take a gun safety class and learn how to shoot stuff these reporters wouldn’t make basic mistakes, “like calling a magazine a clip.”

One clue that someone is really thin skinned when it comes to their pet issue is if they obsess on correct terminology even as the rest of society commonly uses the “wrong” word.  The cross use of magazine and clip is positively ubiquitous in modern society.  

Further  calling magazines “clips” is hardly some function of hippie dippy pacifist commune verbiage. If you want to buy a magazine, or clip, check out The Sportsmans Guide

Shop The Sportsman’s Guide and get great values on in stock Ammo Magazines. Find 1-10 Round Clips and Ammunition Clips for cheap at The Sportsman’s Guide. We offer quality tested Ammo Clip Accessories for all of your Magazine and Clip needs at the lowest prices…guaranteed!

I searched TSG high and low but could not find one “clip” as defined by the gun technocrats like Heller… and it’s not like that organization is a bunch of clueless lefty reporters either.   Other examples of folks interchanging the words magazine and clip while having an exalted level of gun expertise and completely buying into a very expansive view of the 2nd amendment are not hard to find.   Maybe it is time for Heller and the many others who feel obligated to nit pick on this particular symantic disagreement to just relax a bit… but probably the last thing people who need to relax want to hear is that they need to relax.  Especially when they are all armed!

Since Heller is very concerned about how the media reports on guns, he would like to see more stories about how guns have been used to stop crimes.  The example he cites is the 2002 shooting at the Appalachian School of Law.  The gunman was stopped by 2 armed students but not before he killed 3 people and wounded 3 others.  

So according to the logic of Heller and the rest of the gun whackos,  3 people being killed by a madman with a gun is a story that should reflect positively on guns in society because it show’s the results of proper gun usage by those who apprehended Heller.  Heller is not the lone voice in the wilderness on this particular event either.  Google Appalachian School of Law shooting and you find link after link to right wing loons baying about how this is an example of the media refusing to report on how guns help society.   Sort of how the media refuses to use the Australian wildfires of 2009 as proof that brushfires are good.   Sure 173 people died, but many of those fires were contained by using backburns. 

This sort of thinking has me wondering at the fundamental approach from both sides of the political divide to just about every issue.  To me, the fact that some whacko with a gun killed 3 people and wounded 3 others is an example of why gun safety should be a top priority for society.  To the other side the fact that this nutcase was apprehended by other gun owners is an example of why politicians should ignore gun safety as an issue.  Is there any way those 2 perceptions of the same incident could ever be reconciled, on this or any other issue liberals and conservatives do not agree upon?   I suspect not.

Print Friendly
Posted in Conservatives, Gun Control, Politics, Republican Propaganda Machine, The Constitution, The Media | Tagged , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Booker Already at the Finish Line – So Why Play Politics?

BookerNewark Mayor Cory Booker officially announced his candidacy on Saturday for the special election to finish the late Sentator Frank Lautenberg’s term. This ends months of speculation by New Jerseyans on the future of a man who is a bit of a celebrity in the political world. Booker can now prepare for his inevitable victory in an October Special Election to fill the vacant seat, and Chris Christie can have his smug self-satisfaction as he is re-elected to be Governor of New Jersey for a second term.

Booker began fundraising for a Senate run ever since Lautenberg announced in February that he would not be seeking re-election in 2014. In February and March alone, Booker raised $1.9 million without even officially announcing that he would run. The other Democrats who’ve expressed interest in the Senate race are Frank Pallone and Rush Holt. The primary will be held on August 13th. Steve Lonegan is the only Republican who would dare face the unstoppable Booker. Lonegan runs the NJ office of Americans for Prosperity, another shady organization run by the Koch Brothers. But a Tea Party advocate like Lonegan does not stand a chance against Booker, the son of a civil rights activist, a Rhodes Scholar, a man who ran into a house to save a woman from a fire, and staged a hunger strike in the streets of New Jersey to protest drug-dealing.

christieThe special election for the Senate is taking place on October 16th and is estimated to cost about $24 million. Christie claims his decision is consistent with the state Constitution and is needed, despite the cost. Imagine what Chris Christie could do with that money. He could help end poverty in New Jersey, he could increase the minimum wage for low-paying jobs, and he could even help provide affordable healthcare. But this is Chris Christie we’re talking about, and no matter how much he tries to look bipartisan when the media is around, or how much the Tea Party tries to portray him as a secret liberal, he is just a typical, corporate conservative using taxpayer money to serve his own agenda.

In the meantime, Christie has appointed Jeff Chiesa to temporarily fill Lautenberg’s seat. Chiesa is the first Republican Senator from New Jersey in 30 years. When asked about the immigration bill before Congress, temp Senator Chiesa’s response was:

I am a conservative Republican. I don’t want to get into a litany of issues.

So, the already struggling Immigration Reform bill, which is at a critical phase, may not get enough votes in the Senate due to Chiesa’s opposition. Its unclear how many Republicans will vote for the bill, but with one of the members of the “Gang of Eight” leaving the group this week due to “not enough border security” it seems that the Tea Party Caucus may follow this bandwagon to destroy a bill that isn’t about Border Security in the first place.

Print Friendly
Posted in Cory Booker, Cory Booker, Politics, Republicans | Tagged , , , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

So-Called “Christian” Claims That the Black Man in the White House is Leading a Nazi Fourth Reich

Another utterly ridiculous, tabloid-inspired claim by someone who calls himself a Christian.

What is quickly rising in the USA is the Fourth Reich of the Nazi Empire; this is the Fourth Beast as foretold by Daniel in the Holy Bible. I blame America’s preachers for this mess, this modern day Nazi regime did not appear overnight in America.

Is it any wonder the IRS has been harassing conservative, patriotic and Christian organizations that oppose the passage of Obamacare and other parts of the Obama Marxist revolution? Should we be surprised that the NSA is secretly gathering the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans? This isn’t about fighting terrorism in Afghanistan, this is about population control in the USA.

Of course, conservatives are the real Nazis in America.

conservativesnazis

Print Friendly
Posted in Conspiracy Theories, Politics, Religious Right, Republican Propaganda Machine | Tagged , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Beckerhead Brings the Political Game Down to a New Low

Interesting how when Chris Christie shuts down hecklers he’s “refreshing” and “honest” but when its Michelle Obama, the first black First Lady, to Glenn Beck she’s a “monster”.

And then they shut that person up and then she walks back, and then she goes right back into the speech. No little funny thing about, ‘Hey, that was…’ She just went right back into the speech!

This woman’s a monster. She is Lady MacBeth. She is a frightening woman.

So are wives and children now fair game in the political back-and-forth? If so, allow me to suggest that Beck’s wife would have to be purely evil to have married an evil son-of-a-bitch like Beck. And at that level of pure evil she is surely a lousy mother who should have her kids seized by Social Services before they become evil, violent, hateful, racist, homophobic people like their parents; the next serial killers of the radical right. I mean, if this is the game that’s now being played by the radical right, then lets play.

evil glenn beck, his evil wife, and their nasty kids

Print Friendly
Posted in Glenn Beck, Michelle Obama | Tagged ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus