Some Pointless Speculation Inspired By Charlie Crist’s Party Switch

Charlie Crist, onetime Republican superstar governor of Florida, is now a Democrat.  Crist signed the papers at the White House and was given a terrorist fist bump by President Obama in celebration.

It is crazy stuff like Fox personalities labeling the Obama fist bump a “terrorist fist jab” that drives right of center moderates like Charlie Crist, the late Arlen Specter and Lincoln Chafee away from the Republican party.   It is a minor example, to be sure, but it was just more inflammatory rhetoric attacking Obama for something everyone knows is entirely innocent in nature.  The conservative pounding Crist endured for hugging the president further demonstrates how unreasonable the right is.

Not only are real Republicans expected to assail the president over everything, no matter what, but being perceived as being respectful or not overtly hostile to him at every opportunity is a virtual death knell in the party.   The route to fundraising millions and instant Republican celebrity is by treating the president in the most disrespectful way imaginable, in as public a way as possible.  Screaming “you lie” at him during the state of the union is somehow acceptable behavior to these fanatics.  Getting into his face and pointing your bony finger at him on the airport tarmac is ok now.   Is there any wonder that centrists are abandoning the Republican party?

This is where I figuratively drive this post off into left field, over the ditch and through the woods on a bumpy ride down speculation lane.  During the recent campaign I told many of my Mormon in laws that Mitt Romney made a huge mistake by continuing affiliation with the Republican party.  Romney would have made a much more natural fit as a Democrat.   After all, he had no problem etch a sketching his extreme right positions in the Republican primary to a very centrist point of view starting in the first general election debate.  Romney may not have the core convictions of a center leftist, but he would have been more convincing trying to assume that role than he proved to be trying to act like a die hard right wing conservative.

I believe Romney could have played a role as a party switcher very well (he is one hell of a salesman so I think he could have been convincing) and he would have had much less difficulty in finding acceptance on the left than he did on the right.    While conservative Christianists  think Mormonism is a cult, lefties are more tolerant of different religious beliefs in their leaders.

In the recent speculation on the right as to why Romney lost, one reason they focus on is that he did not get as many white voters to the polls as McCain in 2008.  I’m surprised Romney’s religious beliefs and how his religion was perceived by conservative evangelicals has not received scrutiny as a possible reason for that drop off in white voters.  How many white right wing Christianists stayed home, believing that there was no Christian on either ticket.  (Remember, Paul Ryan and Joe Biden are Catholic and many right wing loons believe Catholocism is anti-Christ just as much as they think Mormonism is. )

In my opinion a Romney party switch would have been best conducted following his defeat in the 2008 Republican primaries.  He would have needed to hold his ambitions until the 2016 election, but Romney could have established his center left bonafides in preparation for that campaign.

Not that I think Romney actually has basic liberal beliefs mind you.  He would have had to act the role.  But he had to play a role in any event, because he doesn’t hold basic conservative beliefs either.  Romney simply espouses what ever belief he thinks gives him more of an advantage at any given moment.

Admittedly this is just pointless speculation on my part.  I have no way of proving the theory one way or the other.  But I find the Romney switch theory interesting and plausible, even if my Mormon inlaws tried to guffaw me out of my chair when I proposed it to them.  The more centrist Republicans are forced from an extremist party, and choose to continue public service as Democrats (keep your eye on Cristie for a comeback as a Democratic candidate for Governor) the more I wonder if my little Romney as a Democrat theory would have held water if put to the test.

Print Friendly
Posted in Barack Obama, Campaigns, Election, Liberals, Mitt Romney, Politics, Primaries, Progressives, Religion | Tagged , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Job Growth Continues Under Obama

33 months of job growth under Obama

And according to Moody’s Analytics, we can expect 12 million new jobs in Obama’s second term. What more can I say?

Print Friendly
Posted in Barack Obama, Economic Policy, Employment, Politics | Tagged , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Breaking News! Contraception Stops Pregnancy

The New York Times reports that lawmakers in Texas are reconsidering the vote to defund contraceptive coverage for the states poor women.  Believe it or not, when poor women have access to contraception restricted, they have more babies!   Weird, but true.

Since the babies born to poor women are generally born into poverty, they prove much more of a drain to the state treasury than just subsidizing birth control to those who can not afford it in the first place, but would rather not bring their little ragamuffin treasury leeches into this world.  I know… this stuff is confusing, but I’m trying really hard to explain it so your average Texas State Republican congress critter can understand.  Here are the raw numbers: 

The latest Health and Human Services Commission projections being circulated among Texas lawmakers indicate that during the 2014-15 biennium, poor women will deliver an estimated 23,760 more babies than they would have, as a result of their reduced access to state-subsidized birth control. The additional cost to taxpayers is expected to be as much as $273 million —

 Donna Howard, Democrat of Austin says: “I know some of my colleagues felt like in retrospect they did not fully grasp the implications of what was done last session”.  Those implications were hardly some sort of mystery which no one could have foretold however.   To wit, the fortune tellers and wizards at the non partisan Legislative Budget Board consulted their crystal balls prior to the vote to defund contraceptive coverage.   They predicted the cuts  “would lead 284,000 women to lose family planning services, resulting in 20,000 additional unplanned births at a cost to taxpayers of $231 million.”

Shocking!   The nonpartisan budget wonks pretty much nailed the consequences, but the dunderheaded Republicans decided to move forward with their plan anyway and cost the state millions. 

Ripped from the front page of the great orange satan, DKOS.

Print Friendly
Posted in Medicaid, Planned Parenthood, Politics, Social Programs, State Legislation, Women's Health, Women's Rights | Tagged ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Conservatives Are the Reason We Need Common Core Cirriculum

For some reason, Conservatives like Republican Gov. Nikki Haley, with the help of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) of course, are resisting common core standards in education. The standards are intended to set a national policy for what students should know at particular grade levels.

According to the Washington Times, in a letter opposing Common Core, Haley wrote:

“Just as we should not relinquish control of education to the federal government, neither should we cede it to the consensus of other states. I firmly believe that our government and our people should retain as much local control over programs as possible. … Our children deserve swift action and the passage of a clean resolution that will allow our state to reclaim control of and responsibility for educating South Carolinians.”

Conservatives however, are the biggest reason we need a Common Core curriculum. Consider Indiana State Senator Dennis Kruse; according to the Evansville Courier Press, he has proposed:

a “truth in education” bill meant to give students more latitude to challenge their teachers about theories they don’t agree with.

“Students can actually question things and have teachers then do what they can to find research and sources if what they’re teaching is true,” Kruse said.

“If what they’re teaching is true”?

Kruse said his proposal is meant to require educators to back up their claims with research if students question the teachings. The proposal would allow schools to figure out the details for implementation.

I hate to point out the obvious here, but teachers are the teachers for a reason. We’ve already seen the state of Texas’s approach to “state control of education”. In 2010 there was an outcry by Historians over what Texas wanted to add and remove from their textbooks. As the Washington Post reported at the time:

The curriculum plays down the role of Thomas Jefferson among the founding fathers, questions the separation of church and state, and claims that the U.S. government was infiltrated by Communists during the Cold War.

In Tennessee in January, the Tea Party demanded:

“No portrayal of minority experience in the history which actually occurred shall obscure the experience or contributions of the Founding Fathers, or the majority of citizens, including those who reached positions of leadership.”

They claimed there was:

“an awful lot of made-up criticism about, for instance, the founders intruding on the Indians or having slaves or being hypocrites in one way or another.”

You can be sure, if conservative Hillbillies and Yokels are granted control over textbook content, we’ll be raising generations of students qualified to do nothing more than shovel manure for a living.

Print Friendly
Posted in Education, Republicans, State Legislation, Tea Party | Tagged , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Moms Rising Counter Protest

I posted Tuesday on a Salon report on Campaign to Fix the Debt, which appears to be a faux grassroots organization leading people to believe they’re concerned about the debt. In reality, they’re funded by rich, fat cats pushing to extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich while, as Salon put it, “shredding” the social safety net.

Moms Rising is a real, grassroots organization that focuses on working Americans, with a special emphasis on mothers and families.

We are a transformative online and on-the-ground multicultural organization of more than million members and over a hundred aligned organizations working to increase family economic security, to end discrimination against women and mothers, and to build a nation where both businesses and families can thrive.

None of that “give all the breaks to the rich and, if you’re lucky, they may hire you at minimum wage with no benefits” bullshit. Its all about working mothers and families.

Today, Moms Rising held a counter protest in D.C.

The economic security of moms and their families hangs in the balance as Congress debates how – and whether – to avoid the “fiscal cliff.”  MomsRising is taking action and making the voices of their more than one million members heard through multiple avenues, including: in-district deliveries in nearly 40 states of personal stories from MomsRising members about how the fiscal cliff will impact them; making deliveries to Congressional offices in Washington, D.C. of hundreds of stories about the financial burdens facing moms and dads across the United States, as well as thousands of signatures on petitions calling on Congress to end the Bush era tax cuts for the wealthy.

On Wednesday, December 5, while Members of Congress are negotiating a budget to address the impending fiscal cliff, women, mothers and their families will visit Capitol Hill to deliver those stories and signatures, to ensure that families’ voices are heard in these negotiations.

Now that’s an organization worth your support.

Print Friendly
Posted in Economic Justice, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Women's Rights | Tagged , , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

The Latest Drivel From the Suburban Princess

How exactly does one respond to (to put it politely) – a load of unadulterated crap? The Suburban Princess, Suzanne Venker, has another book coming out and needs some publicity, hence her latest piece of nonsense: “The War On Men” in (surprise!) Fox Opinion. I’m not going to link to it, you can find it yourself; or you could just bang your head against a wall – it would be just as “enlightening”.

Consider this paragraph:

In a nutshell, women are angry. They’re also defensive, though often unknowingly. That’s because they’ve been raised to think of men as the enemy. Armed with this new attitude, women pushed men off their pedestal (women had their own pedestal, but feminists convinced them otherwise) and climbed up to take what they were taught to believe was rightfully theirs.

Now the men have nowhere to go.

Now the Princess claims to have spoken to “hundreds, if not thousands of men and women” (most likely at a Republican convention or something), and claims to have “accidentally stumbled upon a subculture of men” who don’t want to marry. Why you ask? Well- it’s women’s fault of course.

It’s not really “accidental” when you seek out like-minded individuals to reaffirm your particular point of view. It also says something about her lack of research considering, after “13 years”,  she still believes “feminists first took to the streets in the 1970s”.

There’s a shamelessly transparent agenda here: Someone will have to fill Phyllis Schlafly’s anti-women shoes in Conservative Land someday, and the Princess plans on that person being her. Schlafly is Venker’s aunt, and collaborated with her on her last book which was about, what else – the damage feminists have done.

And then there’s this from Venker’s Fox opinion piece:

“…the so-called rise of women has not threatened men. It has pissed them off. It has also undermined their ability to become self-sufficient in the hopes of someday supporting a family. Men want to love women, not compete with them. They want to provide for and protect their families – it’s in their DNA. But modern women won’t let them.”

Women demanding equal education and opportunity has made men unable to be self-sufficient? What kind of insecure men are people of the Schlafly/Venker ilk raising? I don’t know who this woman has talked to, but she probably wouldn’t recognize a mainstream feminist if one smacked her in the head. Are there “radical feminists”? Of course – just like there are religious radicals, and political radicals; but they hardly represent the majority.

In an interview with the Daily Beast, after her Fox piece got some well-deserved blow-back, she said:

A small article “can’t encompass an entire point. An article is meant to engage a reader in a quick way. I am not advocating a strict division of gender roles. I am not suggesting that women can’t compete with men in the workforce or that men can’t handle strong women. People are extrapolating these things because the article is, I admit, rather open-ended.”

Actually Princess, your article is just plain nonsense.

Print Friendly
Posted in Republican War on Women, Women's Rights | Tagged , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Sometimes, Our Fellow Dems Need Their Asses Kicked

Like many of you, I was shocked to read that in the fake “fiscal cliff” talks Republicans are, once again, working to cut Social Security payments and raise the eligibility age for Medicare.  After losing an election where much of the focus was on greedy vulture capitalists like Romney and Ryan’s anti-Medicare budget, why in the world would Republican lawmakers go back to legislation that attacks the social safety net and continues the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy? The short answer is, because they can, they don’t care about working Americans, and they’ll always have the rich guys on their side.

Salon is reporting on a well-funded effort to gut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and transfer all of that money to to the rich in continued tax breaks. Campaign to Fix the Debt is a deliberately misleading name for a group of traitors to working Americans who have started an unprecedented effort at a money grab that would make Bain Capital proud.

The Campaign to Fix the Debt is a huge, and growing, coalition of powerful CEOs, politicians and policy makers on a mission to lower taxes for the rich and cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid under the cover of concern about the national debt. The group was spawned in July 2012 by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, architects of a misguided deficit reduction scheme in Washington back in 2010. By now, the “fixers” have collected a war chest of $43 million. Private equity billionaire Peter G. Peterson, longtime enemy of the social safety net, is a major supporter.

This new Wall Street movement, which includes Republicans and plenty of Democrats [?], is hitting the airwaves, hosting roundtables, gathering at lavish fundraising fêtes, hiring public relations experts, and traveling around the country to push their agenda. They aim to seize the moment of the so-called “fiscal cliff” debate to pressure President Obama to concede to House Republicans and continue the Bush income tax cuts for the rich while shredding the social safety net. The group includes Goldman Sachs’ Lloyd Blankfein, JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon, Honeywell’s David Cote, Aetna’s Mark Bertolini, Delta Airlines’ Richard Anderson, Boeing’s W. James McNerney, and over 100 other influential business honchos and their supporters.

Yes, Salon’s article did say, “and plenty of Democrats”. If you visit the site’s Who We Are page, you’ll find the names of some pretty prominent Dems who are a part of this organization. So the question is: Is Salon completely wrong about this organization? Or are there some terribly misguided Democrats doing who-knows-what to the social safety net? You be the judge. I’ll add that, unlike Republicans who will debate themselves into a pretzel defending every crazy thing their fellow Republicans do, if Salon’s charges are true, I would support an effort to drive these traitorous Democrats out of the Democratic Party.

Print Friendly
Posted in Democrats, Medicaid, Medicare, Politics, Republicans, Social Security | Tagged , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Republicans Link Reagan/Bush Layoffs to Obama’s Re-election

Well, not really… not yet anyway, but give them time. The conservative blogosphere has decided that any lay-off, for any reason, in any industry, that occurs from now on, is the result of President Obama’s re-election. Conservative sites are full of headlines like:

  • Share This Massive List Of Post-Election Firings And Layoffs With Everyone You Can
  • More Mass Layoffs After Obama Reelection
  • The ObamaCare Layoffs Begin

One website, “The Economic Collapse”, salivates over anything negative in the economy to pin on the President; at the same time, the ignorant fools who read this stuff (those Conservatives who never fact check for themselves), eat it up and regurgitate it. I’ve picked a handful of the layoffs they’re attributing to President Obama’s re-election, (which they reprinted from the site “American Thinker”). I’ve added FACT paragraphs after each:

“Obama was “fired up” and so were the voters, and so now, the mass firings begin. Here’s a collection of today’s headlines.  Please say a prayer for the families who will be suffering…”

Sorry, I have to interject one more time. The phony concern over people losing their jobs is laughable considering writers for American “Thinker” have referred to those in need as “shiftless and lazy“, as well as the much-loved Republican label – “Takers“, among other things. Anyway… here’s a sampling of the bogus Blame Obama list:

  • Teco Coal officials announce layoffs

01/17/12: TECO Energy President and Chief Executive Officer John Ramil said… Mild winter weather, low natural gas prices and worldwide economic conditions have caused the selling price for certain types of coal to decline over the past four months. At this time, rather than sell coal at current prices or build inventory, TECO Coal is scaling back production immediately and lowering its 2012 sales projections.” – (The Street, 1/17/12)

  • Momentive Inc plans temporary layoffs for 150

“…the company will lay off workers for a two week period beginning Nov. 12 and ending Nov. 25, with workers returning to the job Nov. 26. According to John Scharf, spokesperson for Momentive Performance Materials Inc., temporary layoffs due to reduced demand are commonplace in manufacturing. “There are slow downs like this at various times, where we don’t receive [as] many orders as other times of the year,” he said… (Tyler Star-News, November 7, 2012)

  • 600 layoffs at Groupon

Groupon has reduced its sales force headcount by 648 positions in the last six months, its SEC disclosures show. In short, Groupon is finally facing the nightmare scenario long predicted by observers of its finances, who note that it only survives on the cushion of cash it got from its IPO and by delaying payments to its merchants. (Business Insider, Nov. 8, 2012)

  • More layoffs announced at Aniston Weapons Incinerator

The company that operated Anniston’s chemical weapons incinerator has 50 fewer workers today as part of continuing efforts to close down the facility… Workers there destroyed the last of Anniston’s chemical weapons stockpile in September 2011 and [have] been undergoing closure efforts ever since. (Anniston Star, Nov 08, 2012

  • Turbocare, Oce to lay off more than 220 workers

Turbocare: Siemens Energy, the parent company for TurboCare… announced Friday that they are consolidating their Manchester, Conn. facility with their headquarters and manufacturing facility in Chicopee… The combination of facilities is being done “in order to adapt to changing market demands in the power generation industry,” according to Siemens Energy spokesperson Melanie Forbrick. (ABC40, November 2nd, 2012)

Oce: Commercial printing is a field that has been hurting for some time because of the changes the Internet has brought. Océ-USA spokesman Jim Magrone said Océ was bought by Canon Inc. of Japan three years ago, and these cutbacks are the consequence of consolidation planned since that purchase. (Hartford Courant, November 5, 2012)

  • ATI plans to lay off 172 workers in North Richland Hills

April 1, 2011: Last year, News 8 began an investigation of ATI, a chain of for-profit trade schools headquartered in North Richland Hills… The company takes in millions of dollars a year, mostly through federal loans and grants.

In a “Summary of Violations,” the state noted that a total of 300 graduates which ATI claimed to have jobs had no jobs at all. An additional 427 graduates were not employed where ATI said they were. The state also found that 5 percent of graduates — 34 of 750 — were listed as “employed” by ATI in a possible effort to pad the job placement reports. (WFAA Dallas/Fort Worth, April 1, 2011)

  • Providence Journal lays off 23 full-time employees

The Providence Journal laid off at least 23 of its roughly 460 employees this week as the paper struggles to stop a continuing decline in its circulation numbers and advertising sales. (WPRI Rhode Island, November 8, 2012) [Hello- Internet! and then there's this story: "Projo hit by 61% drop in advertising since ’05; digital declining"]

There are many more listed in the Economic Collapse post, but you get the drift.

Michelle Malkin, never one to pass up piling-on when it comes to the President, is practically crying over the poor billion dollar companies who will be forced to improve their employees’ lives by providing healthcare. She cites behemoths like Dana Holding Co., that whines about $4 mil a year for employee insurance, and yet, as Reuters has reported:

“…approved a share repurchase program for up to $250 million of its currently outstanding shares of common stock.”

Then there’s her pity party for companies like Covidien, forced to pay the 2.3% excise tax on medical devices when its revenue is a mere $2-3 billion a quarter.

Of course, none of these conservative tools had anything to say when mass layoffs hit a 7 year high in 2008, after the so-called “job creators” took their Bush tax cuts, and pocketed the money. It’s their duty as good little Republicans to defend Corporate America, no matter how much b.s. it takes.

Print Friendly
Posted in Barack Obama, Capitalism, Corporate Greed, Corporations, Employment, Politics, Republicans, Taxes, The Economy | Tagged , , , , , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Equal Education, Unequal Pay

equal education, unequal payFour years after Lily Ledbetter, the gender wage gap still exists. View an informative infographic below the fold from Jessica Wallace at LearnStuff.com.

(more…)

Print Friendly
Posted in Equal Pay, Politics, Women's Rights | Tagged , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus

Dear Obama. For The Good Of The Nation, Rescue The Hostages!

The lead story on the front page of Huffpo right now is titled ”WE’RE KEEPING OUR HOSTAGES”.  The post details how John Boehner told Fox News Sunday that congress would never give control of the debt ceiling to the executive branch.

John Boehner (R-Ohio) said that giving the president control of the debt ceiling is “silliness.”

 ”Congress is never going to give up this power,” the House Speaker told Fox News Sunday. “I’ve made it clear to the president, that every time we get to the debt limit, we need to cut some reforms that are greater than the increase in the debt limit. It’s the only way to leverage the political process to produce more change than what it would if left alone.”

Now is the time for the president to put an end to this form of Republican economic hostage taking once and for all.   At the earliest opportunity, the president should announce that our national economic future will not be bound by the dictates of an unconstitutional law. 

The president should invoke the 14th amendment to rescue the economy being held hostage by the Republican house of representatives.   Section 4 of the 14th amendment reads:

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

The validity of debt authorized by law shall not be questioned.  The amendment is specific in regards debts incurred during the Civil War, but not exclusive to that debt.  It is including that debt.   The law providing that congress must approve debt ceiling increases from time to time does not pass constitutional muster.  

The debt ceiling limit as we currently know it is due to a law passed in 1917.  The constitutionality of the law has never been tested because raising the debt limit was a pro forma process until 2011.   Now that Republicans are using the law to hold the American, and world, economy hostage it is well past time to forget the congenial days of yore.  It is time for the president to rescue the hostages  by enforcing the 14th amendment.

Print Friendly
Posted in Banks and Finance, Barack Obama, Congress, Debt and Budget, Economic Policy, Federal Reserve, Financial Collapse, John Boehner, Politics, The Constitution, The Economy | Tagged , ,
sign-in options Join the discussion at All Things Democrat, sign-in with disqus, facebook, twitter and googleplus